<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>newcritics - Latest Comments in Schlachthaus FÃƒÂ¼nf</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/</link><description>the best in web criticism</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 22:36:45 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Schlachthaus FÃƒÂ¼nf</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/04/12/schlachthaus-funf/#comment-1374689</link><description>Well said, Brendan.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When I saw the news on p. 3 of the Post, I was surprised that it wasn't front page.  Not that I should have been, but my first reaction was, I think, a tribute to his primacy among popular U.S. authors in my lifetime.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom K</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 22:36:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Schlachthaus FÃƒÂ¼nf</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/04/12/schlachthaus-funf/#comment-1374688</link><description>Endings that never quite ended - well said. Vonnegut was often a character in his oown works, but not like Hitchcock put himself into his movies - it wasn't a cute signature; it was a sign of who was boss.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom Watson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 15:51:49 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>