<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>newcritics - Latest Comments in R.I.P. The Wall Street Journal</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/</link><description>the best in web criticism</description><atom:link href="https://newcritics.disqus.com/rip_the_wall_street_journal/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:43:05 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: R.I.P. The Wall Street Journal</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/01/29/rip-the-wall-street-journal/#comment-1383195</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jesus wept.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Viscount LaCarte</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:43:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: R.I.P. The Wall Street Journal</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/01/29/rip-the-wall-street-journal/#comment-1383194</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The editorial page - phew! but the actual editorials could often be vile.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Still, a great paper. Now they're moving it up to the Fox building in mid-town. How sad.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom Watson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 21:24:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: R.I.P. The Wall Street Journal</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/01/29/rip-the-wall-street-journal/#comment-1383193</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sometimes, though, The Wall Street Journal's editorial page offered up a few clams. Though I grant you that the op-ed page occasionally tossed a few bi-valves back.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kathleen Maher</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 10:47:18 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>