<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>newcritics - Latest Comments in Portraying Dr. King</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/</link><description>the best in web criticism</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 00:56:02 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Portraying Dr. King</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/01/15/portraying-dr-king/#comment-1369250</link><description>Oops. I forgot to mention that Dr. King put a copyright on most of his work while he was still alive. It's not in the public domain, for the most part. Another reason that more movies, etc. aren't made about him.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Laura</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 00:56:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Portraying Dr. King</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/01/15/portraying-dr-king/#comment-1369249</link><description>The King estate has a whole bunch of stipulations on use of his image and materials. Makes it very difficult for writers to work with, unfortunately.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Laura</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 00:53:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Portraying Dr. King</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/01/15/portraying-dr-king/#comment-1369248</link><description>Tom, I think you may be correct about King being too iconic to portray.  It is surprising that there hasn't been more movies or television programs created about him.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Claire</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 18:08:12 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>