newcritics - Latest Comments in Paul Is Not Dead

Re: Paul Is Not Dead

carpetketz000 — Sun, 05 Jul 2009 21:56:56 -0000

I really the music of Beattles even I was born in late 90's.. I really enjoy their music.. And for me.. Sir Paul is one of the geniuses in music..

Re: Paul Is Not Dead

wwolfe — Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:05:58 -0000

What appeals to me about Paul is that at his best he acknowledges the sadness in life while trying to find some valid measure of happiness, despite it all. His new album expresses both halves of that formula better than anything since - well, I'm not sure when. If we're using the measuring stick of sustaining good work over an entire album, then maybe since he was in the band he was in before Wings. Why now? I'd guess George's and Linda's deaths have made him consider his own, which in turn made him concentrate a little harder this time around.

Re: Paul Is Not Dead

Willard — Sun, 24 Jun 2007 23:58:10 -0000

Good review, Neddie. From my point of view (and I've been listening to McCartney since "Paperback Writer,"), this is the best of all the McCartney albums, the most introspective, the most artistic.

I read that "Memory Almost Full" is an anagram for "For my soulmate LLM (Linda Louise McCartney). And lo and behold, it is.

That puts quite a spin on this record, wouldn't ya say?

Re: Paul Is Not Dead

Kathleen Maher — Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:43:11 -0000

I haven't heard the new album and probably won't buy it. But I did read the New Yorker article by John Colapinto.

Paul is quoted referring to the song, "That Was Me:"

"There were two people in the Lennon-McCartney songwriting team, and I was one of them. ...One guy who wrote, 'Yesterday,' and I was him. One..who wrote..'Let It Be,' 'Fool on the Hill,' 'Lady Madonna' --...all of these things would be enough for anyone's life."

He really said everything there is to say about realizing you're an artist and trying to create the best work you're able to, with what you have and what comes to you. How many of us get to contribute the tiniest fraction of what he had offered the world?

Re: Paul Is Not Dead

Viscount LaCarte — Sat, 09 Jun 2007 20:31:05 -0000

I think he really needs somebody pushing him, as he had in the Beatles and as he had on Chaos with producer Nigel Godrich.

The Shamus took the words right off of my fingertips. There is nothing wrong with this record. Paul's post-Beatles career has those few standout records (the aforementioned and truly excellent Chaos being the most recent, ) but (except for some of the lyrics as noted by Ned) "Memory Almost Full" is just another in a long line of interchangeable, innocuous, tuneful efforts.

But in this ever-changing world in which we live in - that's not a bad thing.

Re: Paul Is Not Dead

The Shamus — Fri, 08 Jun 2007 10:59:56 -0000

Being a Macca fan, I wish I could get behind this new disc. But it's nowhere near as good as Chaos and Creation In The Backyard. "Fine Line" is the best McCartney song in decades. I think he really needs somebody pushing him, as he had in the Beatles and as he had on Chaos with producer Nigel Godrich. Going back to David Kahne as a producer just meant that he was basically cleaning out whatever was left in the closet. Still, Paul can do whatever he wants to. I think he's more than earned the right.

Re: Paul Is Not Dead

Tom Watson — Thu, 07 Jun 2007 19:43:09 -0000

OK, I've listened - once. And...

I dig it. Tons of McCartney melodies - they're all over the place. The guy can roll out of bed humming a winner, I swear.

I particularly enjoyed End of the End, actually - very light, very straightforward. He says it comes from a covnersation he had with an old Irish woman years ago, who wished him a happy death.

Vintage Clothes - well, it comes within a clunky arrangement of being one of those easy McCartney classics. Over-produced, too many sounds. I'd love to hear him to that one Yesterday or Let It Be style.

Re: Paul Is Not Dead

OutOfContext — Thu, 07 Jun 2007 19:24:04 -0000

This album makes me wonder why my enjoyment of McCartney's music has always greatly exceeded my respect for him. He's really good at what he does. Never game him credit for that before.
I'm also really intrigued by the fact that I could download this DRM-free from emusic for about $3 worth of song credits. I wonder if he's just trying to get his stuff the widest exposure. I don't guess he needs the cash at this point.

Re: Paul Is Not Dead

Tom Watson — Thu, 07 Jun 2007 15:06:59 -0000

Just casually mention that Public Enemy made wonderful use of the classic Lennon-McCartney track "Tomorrow Never Knows" in their "Psycho of Greed" track - but it's only available in bootlegs.

Then you can toss in something like, "you know - Led Zeppelin, Hendrix, The Who are all heavily sampled..."

Re: Paul Is Not Dead

Claire — Thu, 07 Jun 2007 14:51:34 -0000

A lifelong love of things British started because of a Beatles tape slipped into my stocking when I was a little.

I loved that Prague has a Beatles' wall, that the communists used to paint over and over and the students would repaint again and again. One of my teachers in Prague learned English first through the Beatles.

I also love that when I was in China, in a bar listening to a Chinese singer-songwriter-y type, he broke out into "Let it be," putting an incredible emphasis on "IT."

I'll definitely check out any record Neddie extols.

Re: Paul Is Not Dead

blue girl — Thu, 07 Jun 2007 14:29:55 -0000

Of course, BK was being an obstinate teen -- disagreeing with everything his out of it mom had to say, but I'm going to quote you verbatim, TW, as soon as he gets home from school.

:)

If anyone else has any ammunition, this old rocker could use it.

We must stand together against the know it all tykes!

Re: Paul Is Not Dead

Tom Watson — Thu, 07 Jun 2007 14:08:33 -0000

Absoutely - probably the most sampled rock band. And of course, the Gray Album is considered a tour de force in artsy hip-hop circles.

The guys who first scratched records and ran DJ samples in the Bronx in the early 70s used classic rock a lot.

Re: Paul Is Not Dead

blue girl — Thu, 07 Jun 2007 14:04:08 -0000

Here's a question that we discussed last night. Maybe some of you can give your thoughts.

Did The Beatles have any influence whatsoever on hip hop and rap?

Discuss.

Re: Paul Is Not Dead

Tom Watson — Thu, 07 Jun 2007 13:54:10 -0000

Two great ones, BG - his early post-Beatles work was superb. I, for one, totally dig Maybe I'm Amazed.

On Paul and Keith Richards, the mullet worked.

Re: Paul Is Not Dead

Neddie Jingo — Thu, 07 Jun 2007 13:30:59 -0000

It occurs to one that Paulie's haircut during the Seventies could possibly have been referred to as "the Mullet of Kintyre."

Just a thought.

Re: Paul Is Not Dead

blue girl — Thu, 07 Jun 2007 13:30:41 -0000

I've been listening to Jet and Band on the Run all day like the obsessive compulsive that I can be.

Crank it up!

Yeeees -- Owooooo!

Re: Paul Is Not Dead

Tom Watson — Thu, 07 Jun 2007 12:47:12 -0000

Or Mull on Kintyre for that matter - McCartney's had a string of oddball hits, come to think of it.

My 15-year-old loves the Beatles. She's learning guitar so she cam play the songs. Her friends love the Beatles. It amazes me.

Re: Paul Is Not Dead

Neddie Jingo — Thu, 07 Jun 2007 12:46:50 -0000

Thank you, Kevin. High compliment indeed. I'm touched.

Re: Paul Is Not Dead

Neddie Jingo — Thu, 07 Jun 2007 12:45:07 -0000

And listen, the fact that weÃ¢â‚¬â„¢re all still analyzing the Beatles is testament to their work and talent.

This is gonna sound pretentious as all hell, but here goes anyway: The Beatles' story has the arc and scope of classical tragedy. The heroes are undone by a combination of Epstein's (the Father's) death and elements of hubris that were present in them at the beginning of the story -- the Lennon/McCartney songwriting partnership that essentially dissolved very early on. Even the personalities assigned to the four (the handsome one, the quiet one, etc.) are literary archetypes. Note how carefully the artificially created Monkees assumed essentially the same four personalities.

I haven't read it, but I'm told that one of Nick Hornby's novels riffs on this idea. (Wish I could remember which one.)

Re: Paul Is Not Dead

Jason Chervokas — Thu, 07 Jun 2007 12:40:23 -0000

Not nearly as odd as "Uncle Albert" or as obscure as "Jet" or "Band on the Run"

Re: Paul Is Not Dead

Kevin Wolf — Thu, 07 Jun 2007 12:35:32 -0000

I'm not the student of Beatles and post-Beatles material that I should be given my age but I enjoy reading whatever Neddie has to say on the subject.

I haven't heard the album but definitely will seek it out. (He's got a few albums I've never even heard.)

Is there anybody else who thinks "Let 'Em In" is one of the oddest records ever to become a big AM hit?

Re: Paul Is Not Dead

Viscount LaCarte — Thu, 07 Jun 2007 11:46:50 -0000

When my oldest (now 20) was a mere 18 months, we were in the waiting room at the doc's, and Let it Be came on the music system. She said (to everyone's amazement except mine!)

Dats Da Beeeetles!

Speaking of
The Beetles...

Re: Paul Is Not Dead

blue girl — Thu, 07 Jun 2007 11:31:49 -0000

(OK, weÃ¢â‚¬â„¢re old too - so fucking what? Piss off, youngster! Move along little tyke, thereÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s nothing to see here.)

LOL!

This post started a great conversation around the dinner table with Blue Kid last night. So, I thank you for that, Jeddie.

Blue Kid knows how good The Beatles are/were. He loves 'em. He's got all the CDs.

Re: Paul Is Not Dead

Tom Watson — Thu, 07 Jun 2007 08:37:57 -0000

I liked the photo too - maybe it will convince Macca to finally abandon the hideous hair dye.

And listen, the fact that we're all still analyzing the Beatles is testament to their work and talent. I mean, we've had what, five Beatles posts here in the last week or so?

(OK, we're old too - so fucking what? Piss off, youngster! Move along little tyke, there's nothing to see here.)

Re: Paul Is Not Dead

Jason Chervokas — Thu, 07 Jun 2007 07:20:17 -0000

Jeez, I loved that NYer photo. It looked like an aging showbiz guy, whatever make up just served as a garish yardstick against which could be measured the lines on the man's face. I think it said "aging teen idol with an artist's eyes" better than the profile did (and I loved the profile).

Looking forward to the record.