Great review, Jeddie. I'll get this one. I, myself, like Sir Paul. Even his cheesey stuff.
I mean, I like silly love songs. But, that's just me. I'm goopy that way.
The time that I thought would last My ever present past
Don't really like that first line, cuz I've never felt that way. You knowit doesn't last. But, I do like the line My ever present past.
Reminds me of my problem with getting into new music. I need my music to have some history. A solid foundation. A little gravity.
Anyway, I could keep writing nonsense, but I'll stop now. I'll go see if I can download this. Probably, huh?
health insurance coverage
· 3 months ago
The record was totally awesome, Paul did a great job on it. Oh how I miss the band and how they performs
Tom Watson
· 2 years ago
I downloaded the record, but haven't listened yet. Will do soon.
But I thoroughly enjoyed the profile in this week's New Yorker on Macca by John Colapinto. See if you can pick it up - parts of it quite sad really. They only have an abstract up.
What comes across is that happy-go-lucky Paul has been thoroughly touched by ever-human tragedy and is only starting to realize his - his mum, his bass player, John's mum, John, Linda, George, his rebound marriage. Lots of melancholy.
OutOfContext
· 2 years ago
I was surprised to find this available on eMusic and Napster-to-go with some additional tracks, including a 26 minute monologue that works through each song. I confess, I never would have gotten near it if I had to buy it without preview (take note music industry). I have to say I love this album. I've listened to it 4 times in the last 24 hours. It's simple, melodic and interesting--Dance Tonight,You Tell Me and The End of the End are just plain great. I'm going to write about this one.
Tom Watson
· 2 years ago
From a deli man, that's a rave!
Neddie Jingo
· 2 years ago
But, I do like the line My ever present past.
Reminds me of my problem with getting into new music. I need my music to have some history. A solid foundation. A little gravity.
GlueBirl, you have absolutely hit the nub of the biscuit on the head of the apostrophe.
Paul's problem post-Lennon's-assassination is that he's not, you know, dead. He's actually had to live into middle age. He didn't get to give us "Working Class Hero" and then be providentially assassinated. Those of us who've accompanied him there deeply appreciate the implicit message in something like "Vintage Clothes," where the idea is, "I've seen this before, honestly it bores me, what else can you show me?"
Since our society seems to work according to ever-narrowing cycles of nostalgia, where what's hip and what's square appear to be aimed in tighter and tighter centrifugal circles at each others' fundamental apertures, we who've seen these cycles before become less and less impressed with their allure.
Drop out from the madness! Be your own fashion consultant! Wear and hear and watch what you like, and not what some power-mad sociopath thinks you should wear! There is no more revolutionary act.
You owe it to yourself.
Neddie Jingo
· 2 years ago
But I thoroughly enjoyed the profile in this week’s New Yorker on Macca by John Colapinto.
Oog, that full-face photo of Sir Paul! The most uncomplimentary lighting possible! What a horror!
I don't know about the internal workings at The New Yorker, but they seem to have hired a photog who brings out the absolute worst in his subjects. I remember a full-face photo of Dan Rather last year that should have been the casus belli is an antidefamation suit -- the most uncomplimentary photo imaginable...
Jason Chervokas
· 2 years ago
Jeez, I loved that NYer photo. It looked like an aging showbiz guy, whatever make up just served as a garish yardstick against which could be measured the lines on the man's face. I think it said "aging teen idol with an artist's eyes" better than the profile did (and I loved the profile).
Looking forward to the record.
Tom Watson
· 2 years ago
I liked the photo too - maybe it will convince Macca to finally abandon the hideous hair dye.
And listen, the fact that we're all still analyzing the Beatles is testament to their work and talent. I mean, we've had what, five Beatles posts here in the last week or so?
(OK, we're old too - so fucking what? Piss off, youngster! Move along little tyke, there's nothing to see here.)
blue girl
· 2 years ago
(OK, we’re old too - so fucking what? Piss off, youngster! Move along little tyke, there’s nothing to see here.)
LOL!
This post started a great conversation around the dinner table with Blue Kid last night. So, I thank you for that, Jeddie.
Blue Kid knows how good The Beatles are/were. He loves 'em. He's got all the CDs.
Viscount LaCarte
· 2 years ago
When my oldest (now 20) was a mere 18 months, we were in the waiting room at the doc's, and Let it Be came on the music system. She said (to everyone's amazement except mine!)
I'm not the student of Beatles and post-Beatles material that I should be given my age but I enjoy reading whatever Neddie has to say on the subject.
I haven't heard the album but definitely will seek it out. (He's got a few albums I've never even heard.)
Is there anybody else who thinks "Let 'Em In" is one of the oddest records ever to become a big AM hit?
Jason Chervokas
· 2 years ago
Not nearly as odd as "Uncle Albert" or as obscure as "Jet" or "Band on the Run"
Neddie Jingo
· 2 years ago
And listen, the fact that we’re all still analyzing the Beatles is testament to their work and talent.
This is gonna sound pretentious as all hell, but here goes anyway: The Beatles' story has the arc and scope of classical tragedy. The heroes are undone by a combination of Epstein's (the Father's) death and elements of hubris that were present in them at the beginning of the story -- the Lennon/McCartney songwriting partnership that essentially dissolved very early on. Even the personalities assigned to the four (the handsome one, the quiet one, etc.) are literary archetypes. Note how carefully the artificially created Monkees assumed essentially the same four personalities.
I haven't read it, but I'm told that one of Nick Hornby's novels riffs on this idea. (Wish I could remember which one.)
Neddie Jingo
· 2 years ago
Thank you, Kevin. High compliment indeed. I'm touched.
Tom Watson
· 2 years ago
Or Mull on Kintyre for that matter - McCartney's had a string of oddball hits, come to think of it.
My 15-year-old loves the Beatles. She's learning guitar so she cam play the songs. Her friends love the Beatles. It amazes me.
blue girl
· 2 years ago
I've been listening to Jet and Band on the Run all day like the obsessive compulsive that I can be.
Crank it up!
Yeeees -- Owooooo!
Neddie Jingo
· 2 years ago
It occurs to one that Paulie's haircut during the Seventies could possibly have been referred to as "the Mullet of Kintyre."
Just a thought.
Tom Watson
· 2 years ago
Two great ones, BG - his early post-Beatles work was superb. I, for one, totally dig Maybe I'm Amazed.
On Paul and Keith Richards, the mullet worked.
blue girl
· 2 years ago
Here's a question that we discussed last night. Maybe some of you can give your thoughts.
Did The Beatles have any influence whatsoever on hip hop and rap?
Discuss.
Tom Watson
· 2 years ago
Absoutely - probably the most sampled rock band. And of course, the Gray Album is considered a tour de force in artsy hip-hop circles.
The guys who first scratched records and ran DJ samples in the Bronx in the early 70s used classic rock a lot.
blue girl
· 2 years ago
Of course, BK was being an obstinate teen -- disagreeing with everything his out of it mom had to say, but I'm going to quote you verbatim, TW, as soon as he gets home from school.
:)
If anyone else has any ammunition, this old rocker could use it.
We must stand together against the know it all tykes!
Claire
· 2 years ago
A lifelong love of things British started because of a Beatles tape slipped into my stocking when I was a little.
I loved that Prague has a Beatles' wall, that the communists used to paint over and over and the students would repaint again and again. One of my teachers in Prague learned English first through the Beatles.
I also love that when I was in China, in a bar listening to a Chinese singer-songwriter-y type, he broke out into "Let it be," putting an incredible emphasis on "IT."
I'll definitely check out any record Neddie extols.
Tom Watson
· 2 years ago
Just casually mention that Public Enemy made wonderful use of the classic Lennon-McCartney track "Tomorrow Never Knows" in their "Psycho of Greed" track - but it's only available in bootlegs.
Then you can toss in something like, "you know - Led Zeppelin, Hendrix, The Who are all heavily sampled..."
OutOfContext
· 2 years ago
This album makes me wonder why my enjoyment of McCartney's music has always greatly exceeded my respect for him. He's really good at what he does. Never game him credit for that before. I'm also really intrigued by the fact that I could download this DRM-free from emusic for about $3 worth of song credits. I wonder if he's just trying to get his stuff the widest exposure. I don't guess he needs the cash at this point.
Tom Watson
· 2 years ago
OK, I've listened - once. And...
I dig it. Tons of McCartney melodies - they're all over the place. The guy can roll out of bed humming a winner, I swear.
I particularly enjoyed End of the End, actually - very light, very straightforward. He says it comes from a covnersation he had with an old Irish woman years ago, who wished him a happy death.
Vintage Clothes - well, it comes within a clunky arrangement of being one of those easy McCartney classics. Over-produced, too many sounds. I'd love to hear him to that one Yesterday or Let It Be style.
The Shamus
· 2 years ago
Being a Macca fan, I wish I could get behind this new disc. But it's nowhere near as good as Chaos and Creation In The Backyard. "Fine Line" is the best McCartney song in decades. I think he really needs somebody pushing him, as he had in the Beatles and as he had on Chaos with producer Nigel Godrich. Going back to David Kahne as a producer just meant that he was basically cleaning out whatever was left in the closet. Still, Paul can do whatever he wants to. I think he's more than earned the right.
Viscount LaCarte
· 2 years ago
I think he really needs somebody pushing him, as he had in the Beatles and as he had on Chaos with producer Nigel Godrich.
The Shamus took the words right off of my fingertips. There is nothing wrong with this record. Paul's post-Beatles career has those few standout records (the aforementioned and truly excellent Chaos being the most recent, ) but (except for some of the lyrics as noted by Ned) "Memory Almost Full" is just another in a long line of interchangeable, innocuous, tuneful efforts.
But in this ever-changing world in which we live in - that's not a bad thing.
Kathleen Maher
· 2 years ago
I haven't heard the new album and probably won't buy it. But I did read the New Yorker article by John Colapinto.
Paul is quoted referring to the song, "That Was Me:"
"There were two people in the Lennon-McCartney songwriting team, and I was one of them. ...One guy who wrote, 'Yesterday,' and I was him. One..who wrote..'Let It Be,' 'Fool on the Hill,' 'Lady Madonna' --...all of these things would be enough for anyone's life."
He really said everything there is to say about realizing you're an artist and trying to create the best work you're able to, with what you have and what comes to you. How many of us get to contribute the tiniest fraction of what he had offered the world?
Willard
· 2 years ago
Good review, Neddie. From my point of view (and I've been listening to McCartney since "Paperback Writer,"), this is the best of all the McCartney albums, the most introspective, the most artistic.
I read that "Memory Almost Full" is an anagram for "For my soulmate LLM (Linda Louise McCartney). And lo and behold, it is.
That puts quite a spin on this record, wouldn't ya say?
wwolfe
· 2 years ago
What appeals to me about Paul is that at his best he acknowledges the sadness in life while trying to find some valid measure of happiness, despite it all. His new album expresses both halves of that formula better than anything since - well, I'm not sure when. If we're using the measuring stick of sustaining good work over an entire album, then maybe since he was in the band he was in before Wings. Why now? I'd guess George's and Linda's deaths have made him consider his own, which in turn made him concentrate a little harder this time around.
carpet cleaning miami
· 4 months ago
I really the music of Beattles even I was born in late 90's.. I really enjoy their music.. And for me.. Sir Paul is one of the geniuses in music..
All Comments
I mean, I like silly love songs. But, that's just me. I'm goopy that way.
The time that I thought would last
My ever present past
Don't really like that first line, cuz I've never felt that way. You knowit doesn't last. But, I do like the line My ever present past.
Reminds me of my problem with getting into new music. I need my music to have some history. A solid foundation. A little gravity.
Anyway, I could keep writing nonsense, but I'll stop now. I'll go see if I can download this. Probably, huh?
But I thoroughly enjoyed the profile in this week's New Yorker on Macca by John Colapinto. See if you can pick it up - parts of it quite sad really. They only have an abstract up.
What comes across is that happy-go-lucky Paul has been thoroughly touched by ever-human tragedy and is only starting to realize his - his mum, his bass player, John's mum, John, Linda, George, his rebound marriage. Lots of melancholy.
Reminds me of my problem with getting into new music. I need my music to have some history. A solid foundation. A little gravity.
GlueBirl, you have absolutely hit the nub of the biscuit on the head of the apostrophe.
Paul's problem post-Lennon's-assassination is that he's not, you know, dead. He's actually had to live into middle age. He didn't get to give us "Working Class Hero" and then be providentially assassinated. Those of us who've accompanied him there deeply appreciate the implicit message in something like "Vintage Clothes," where the idea is, "I've seen this before, honestly it bores me, what else can you show me?"
Since our society seems to work according to ever-narrowing cycles of nostalgia, where what's hip and what's square appear to be aimed in tighter and tighter centrifugal circles at each others' fundamental apertures, we who've seen these cycles before become less and less impressed with their allure.
Drop out from the madness! Be your own fashion consultant! Wear and hear and watch what you like, and not what some power-mad sociopath thinks you should wear! There is no more revolutionary act.
You owe it to yourself.
Oog, that full-face photo of Sir Paul! The most uncomplimentary lighting possible! What a horror!
I don't know about the internal workings at The New Yorker, but they seem to have hired a photog who brings out the absolute worst in his subjects. I remember a full-face photo of Dan Rather last year that should have been the casus belli is an antidefamation suit -- the most uncomplimentary photo imaginable...
Looking forward to the record.
And listen, the fact that we're all still analyzing the Beatles is testament to their work and talent. I mean, we've had what, five Beatles posts here in the last week or so?
(OK, we're old too - so fucking what? Piss off, youngster! Move along little tyke, there's nothing to see here.)
LOL!
This post started a great conversation around the dinner table with Blue Kid last night. So, I thank you for that, Jeddie.
Blue Kid knows how good The Beatles are/were. He loves 'em. He's got all the CDs.
Dats Da Beeeetles!
Speaking of
The Beetles...
I haven't heard the album but definitely will seek it out. (He's got a few albums I've never even heard.)
Is there anybody else who thinks "Let 'Em In" is one of the oddest records ever to become a big AM hit?
This is gonna sound pretentious as all hell, but here goes anyway: The Beatles' story has the arc and scope of classical tragedy. The heroes are undone by a combination of Epstein's (the Father's) death and elements of hubris that were present in them at the beginning of the story -- the Lennon/McCartney songwriting partnership that essentially dissolved very early on. Even the personalities assigned to the four (the handsome one, the quiet one, etc.) are literary archetypes. Note how carefully the artificially created Monkees assumed essentially the same four personalities.
I haven't read it, but I'm told that one of Nick Hornby's novels riffs on this idea. (Wish I could remember which one.)
My 15-year-old loves the Beatles. She's learning guitar so she cam play the songs. Her friends love the Beatles. It amazes me.
Crank it up!
Yeeees -- Owooooo!
Just a thought.
On Paul and Keith Richards, the mullet worked.
Did The Beatles have any influence whatsoever on hip hop and rap?
Discuss.
The guys who first scratched records and ran DJ samples in the Bronx in the early 70s used classic rock a lot.
:)
If anyone else has any ammunition, this old rocker could use it.
We must stand together against the know it all tykes!
I loved that Prague has a Beatles' wall, that the communists used to paint over and over and the students would repaint again and again. One of my teachers in Prague learned English first through the Beatles.
I also love that when I was in China, in a bar listening to a Chinese singer-songwriter-y type, he broke out into "Let it be," putting an incredible emphasis on "IT."
I'll definitely check out any record Neddie extols.
Then you can toss in something like, "you know - Led Zeppelin, Hendrix, The Who are all heavily sampled..."
I'm also really intrigued by the fact that I could download this DRM-free from emusic for about $3 worth of song credits. I wonder if he's just trying to get his stuff the widest exposure. I don't guess he needs the cash at this point.
I dig it. Tons of McCartney melodies - they're all over the place. The guy can roll out of bed humming a winner, I swear.
I particularly enjoyed End of the End, actually - very light, very straightforward. He says it comes from a covnersation he had with an old Irish woman years ago, who wished him a happy death.
Vintage Clothes - well, it comes within a clunky arrangement of being one of those easy McCartney classics. Over-produced, too many sounds. I'd love to hear him to that one Yesterday or Let It Be style.
The Shamus took the words right off of my fingertips. There is nothing wrong with this record. Paul's post-Beatles career has those few standout records (the aforementioned and truly excellent Chaos being the most recent, ) but (except for some of the lyrics as noted by Ned) "Memory Almost Full" is just another in a long line of interchangeable, innocuous, tuneful efforts.
But in this ever-changing world in which we live in - that's not a bad thing.
Paul is quoted referring to the song, "That Was Me:"
"There were two people in the Lennon-McCartney songwriting team, and I was one of them. ...One guy who wrote, 'Yesterday,' and I was him. One..who wrote..'Let It Be,' 'Fool on the Hill,' 'Lady Madonna' --...all of these things would be enough for anyone's life."
He really said everything there is to say about realizing you're an artist and trying to create the best work you're able to, with what you have and what comes to you. How many of us get to contribute the tiniest fraction of what he had offered the world?
I read that "Memory Almost Full" is an anagram for "For my soulmate LLM (Linda Louise McCartney). And lo and behold, it is.
That puts quite a spin on this record, wouldn't ya say?