-
Website
http://www.newcritics.com -
Original page
http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/08/09/mad-men-your-fantasy-or-mine/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
web directory
24 comments · 1 points
-
kathleenmaher
13 comments · 11 points
-
Jason_Chervokas
28 comments · 4 points
-
Dan Leo
25 comments · 4 points
-
Stroke Treatment
63 comments · 4 points
-
-
Popular Threads
I'm with you, I'm enough of a design fanboy that I'm tuning in yet again.
Shoot.
I'm Brooks Brothers, head to toe. I'll go change.
Tassels on the loafers still ok, though?
Ugh! I hate that.
Wolcott's right--this is the worst advertising agency I've ever heard of.
He just bugs me.
I noticed Tim Hunter's directing, who made "River's Edge" and worked on Twin Peaks and I think Deadwood and Sopranos. But, y'know, a TV director ain't exactly an auteur, is he or she?
The lonely divorcee angle seems a little overplayed, too.
Gee even the kids on this show are having midlife crises.
I'm not even going to go downstairs to watch anymore. I'll just read the comments and contribute all willy-nilly.
Love Robert Morse, though--has real unforced authority.
Still a rather flat episode in general.
But y'know, a problem with the show is the problem with all these shows that have assumed the multi-plot soap opera format. It's a meagerness of drama and development. I kinda miss the old days when a night-time TV show would have just one story per episode, a story that would actually be resolved, you know, like an episode of Then Came Bronson or The Fugitive. The main character's story continues on, but we've seen one complete story on a given night. The problem with these soap-opera sort of shows is that when they're not done really well you just have a string of sub-plots that just leave you hanging.
So I know this is not going to be one of those old-style shows with a beginning, middle and end each episode, but I kinda miss that. But I'm an old fart.
Combining the creepy extremism of Hair Fetish Boy with the tired cliches of Anxious, Unsatisfied Suburban Housewife and Emotionally Crippled Blueblood Son and Emotionally Distant Blueblood Dad and Bohemian/Slightly Slutty Ad Artist Girl and god knows how many else...it's just a bunch of symbols standing in for a story.
When I was listening to the DVD commentary for "Hot Fuzz," Edgar Wright mentioned that he and Simon Pegg got Roger Ebert's "Little Book of Movie Cliches" so that they could make sure they included every last one of them in their screenplay. But they were doing it to take the piss. What's Weiner's excuse?
I'm also really not buying the ad agency angle. Those steel campaigns Draper came up with WERE crap. "Oh Little Town of Bethlehem"? Puh-leeze. I actually DID like "The Backbone of America." It was much better than Don's two attempts. I thought he was supposed to be such a natural at this?
And he and Sterling really disdain the notion of pitching to a client in a bar? Who ARE they, anyway?
The one scene I liked was Sterling handling the non-firing of Campbell. I wasn't sure how that would be handled without Don losing face.
I agree that Kartheiser's not right for Pete. I DO still see sulky Connor. Whereas Campbell isn't supposed to be sulky--he's supposed to be overprivileged, arrogant, and troubled.
Pete could have saved the account less destructively -- his idea *was* better than Don's -- and gotten a step up from being the team's whoremaster.
As for the kid, how did he get that screwed up, with a boatload of paraphilias? Weiner has to stop with the explications, already -- they won't be there in syndication, so why not expand the episodes, to show, not tell?
Damages I lost interest in after two episodes - as it was clear it was headed for mindfuck territory and didn't have a plan worked out. Yes, we're all mean, now move on.
Madmen I settled into in episode 1, got bored with by episode 3, and after episode 4 I have the Season 1 story arc figured out. Don Draper is set up to suck (their advertising does, definitely). Pete Campbell realizes he's an adman - the two end up hitting it off together -- but who cares about these people? And why is it all telegraphed from afar? TV-viewers can't be this stupid, we don't need things written on our noses to get the point, or?
So - Madmen is getting as confused as Studio 60 - and is soon transformed into Desperate Housewives if they don't watch it.
I'm bored already.
Both firms feature hidebound, incompetent, self-affirming bureaucracies who reward failure with bourbon and accepted affairs, who sell out anyone darker or more passionate, on campaigns which look good on paper, but don't really pan out well, and employees who, after frakking up their worlds just enough to ensure continued employment, go home to the wife and the kids, smug that the crap they sow won't follow them home, at all.
Me, issues? Yes, I've got a few -- but seeing how that MAD MEN attitude flowed over to the men who had their delirium tremens fingers over the nuclear trigger, just got my dander up, is all...
This show is the best I seen in years. Just wonderful.