<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>newcritics - Latest Comments in Hollywoodland</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/</link><description>the best in web criticism</description><atom:link href="https://newcritics.disqus.com/hollywoodland/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 13:27:06 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Hollywoodland</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/02/10/hollywoodland/#comment-1372720</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great review. I was amazed by how good Afflect was. He made a pretty boring movie completely watchable.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MikePLewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 13:27:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hollywoodland</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/02/10/hollywoodland/#comment-1372697</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Lance I still want to see this movie - something about the title. I've only spent a small amount of time in LA, but remain taken with the vintage Hollywood - before it ran downhill...seems like an interesting cast too.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom Watson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 18:52:47 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>