-
Website
http://www.newcritics.com -
Original page
http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/05/05/hollywoods-censor/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
web directory
24 comments · 1 points
-
kathleenmaher
13 comments · 11 points
-
Jason_Chervokas
28 comments · 4 points
-
Dan Leo
25 comments · 4 points
-
Stroke Treatment
63 comments · 4 points
-
-
Popular Threads
Of course, the Code era, for me, was summed up best in The Celluloid Closet; Vito Russo's thorough examination of qwhat the Code meant (and didn't mean for gay characters and gay themes really captures so much of what the restrictions did and didn't do, and what, really, they could never do, which was completely thwart communication between creative artists and a public starved for interesting ideas.
I don't know about "auteur" theory; I tend to think censorship, like anything stifling, pushes creative people to be more creative. One foot on the floor? Well, okay, we'll play up double entendres. Bad endings for bad people? Okay, we can subvert that logic by making bad endings... not so bad. Or good ones... not so good.
But I agree that what draws me back to the "classics" is the effects of money, vertical integration and studio control; censorship was an ugly stain, a conspicuous failure, and a stifling element on Hollywood... not an improvement. And I'm not sure the Breen era fascinates me quite so much as Will Hays... and the period before censorship. Though I know I need to know the rest... it's what came before, the stuff that led to the Code, and to the Breen office, that to me, is most compelling. Thanks for the review... and the think.
It's only in the past decade or so that so-called pre-code films have become widely available and I agree, the more I see of the era the more fascinated I become.