<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>newcritics - Latest Comments in Grand Old Man of the New Journalism</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/</link><description>the best in web criticism</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 12:49:15 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Grand Old Man of the New Journalism</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/06/14/grand-old-man-of-the-new-journalism/#comment-722093</link><description>I have only read the 'kool-aid acid test' and a few essays. I was really knocked out by 'acid-test'. He reveals many unspoken truths about our culture with elegant prose and wit -- but to me there's a patronizing tone. Perhaps I need to take another look since he's so adored.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RalphDeMarco</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 12:49:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Grand Old Man of the New Journalism</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/06/14/grand-old-man-of-the-new-journalism/#comment-703075</link><description>Wolfe is a fine writer, but I always thought Leonard Bernstein (full disclosure: my favorite conductor) got a raw deal from him.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Campaspe</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 18:55:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Grand Old Man of the New Journalism</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/06/14/grand-old-man-of-the-new-journalism/#comment-697927</link><description>The Right Stuff, whatever its faults as accurate journalism, is a helluva good read, perhaps because the view Wolfe took of the space program was such a contrast to the Life Magazine publicity machine's output.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But I agree with Tom (Watson, not Wolfe) on the tendency toward a one-dimensional view of whatever subject is at hand. Reading Wolfe on modern art and architecture (particularly The Painted Word but also From Bauhaus to Our House) can be annoying as hell if you know anything at all about art. He certainly did not convince me, despite its excesses and methods, that the entire project of Modern Art -- which occupied so many people and had such an impact in the 20th Century -- was complete bullshit, though he certainly tried.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KevinWolf</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 06:36:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Grand Old Man of the New Journalism</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/06/14/grand-old-man-of-the-new-journalism/#comment-694526</link><description>My view on Bonfire came from working as a political reporter in the Bronx at the time - and yes, it was incredibly ham-handed, no nuance at all. Even the Al Sharpton character was the merest of caricatures....</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tomwatson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:17:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Grand Old Man of the New Journalism</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/06/14/grand-old-man-of-the-new-journalism/#comment-694451</link><description>Man oh man, how I used to love Wolfe's write stuff.  But Bonfire of the Vanities soured me a bit, and not because of its politics, but because it was so hamhanded in its characterizations.  And then I learned that my favorite of his non-fiction books, The Right Stuff, included a fair amount of fiction.  Now I'm no longer sure what I think, unless I'm actually reading something by him.  Then I tend to think, Wow can this man tell a really fine lie!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LanceMannion</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:09:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Grand Old Man of the New Journalism</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/06/14/grand-old-man-of-the-new-journalism/#comment-693992</link><description>Bob - he is indeed a fascinating figure. It's funny, because he was praised so lavishly for Bonfire of the Vanities - yet he got it so damned wrong! Or rather, he got a one-dimensional cartoonish view from a single source (a law-and-order Bronx judge who was his pal) - yet it's considered a a true journal of 80s New York!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tomwatson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 16:16:13 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>