<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>newcritics - Latest Comments in Finding Iris Chang</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/</link><description>the best in web criticism</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 16:27:38 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Finding Iris Chang</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/12/14/finding-iris-chang/#comment-1382271</link><description>Hi Kathleen, thanks for your comment.  I know what you mean about how it is troubling that we tend to label people (sometimes) willy nilly as being mentally ill.  Chang was diagnosed as bi-polar, though.  I think you might enjoy the book.  I thought of you at the party for Paula and wished you could have been there.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Claire Helene</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 16:27:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Finding Iris Chang</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/12/14/finding-iris-chang/#comment-1382270</link><description>While I see suicide as horrific, and the result of an inner torment only the sufferer can possibly know, I often wonder at how easily people who are "excitable" and alternately "brooding" are classified as mentally ill.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We do need to pay attention to signals and take whatever possible measure we can to prevent suicide. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But what some people manage to endure amazes me. When someone else just can &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; go on, I can often follow the logic.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kathleen Maher</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 13:31:08 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>