<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>newcritics - Latest Comments in Dryden&amp;#8217;s 17th Century Literary Propaganda</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/</link><description>the best in web criticism</description><atom:link href="https://newcritics.disqus.com/dryden8217s_17th_century_literary_propaganda/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 19:51:45 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Dryden&amp;#8217;s 17th Century Literary Propaganda</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/05/15/drydens-17th-century-literary-propaganda/#comment-1374896</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for sending me back to Dryden. I hadn't read him for 40 years. They knew how to write in those days!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 19:51:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dryden&amp;#8217;s 17th Century Literary Propaganda</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/05/15/drydens-17th-century-literary-propaganda/#comment-1374895</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah our conversation with the old testament is limited these days - but what a wonderful post. Context is all. And yes, propaganda can indeed by literature. I'm into Camus right now as a matter of fact...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom Watson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 20:08:16 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>