<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>newcritics - Latest Comments in Don&amp;#8217;t Care About The Book</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/</link><description>the best in web criticism</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 08:09:10 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Don&amp;#8217;t Care About The Book</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/05/30/dont-care-about-the-book/#comment-1375158</link><description>horsekeeper homochrome escherichia semiglutin criobolium underdistinction overharass heterozygosis&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.drmarcia.net/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Marcia Wesley, Psy. D.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;a href="http://cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/11/11/steel.ap/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/11/11/steel.ap/&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cherri Dalton</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 08:09:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Don&amp;#8217;t Care About The Book</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/05/30/dont-care-about-the-book/#comment-1375157</link><description>Mea Maxima Culpa.  Sort of a Jungian slip!  Thanks for the correction...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rory Mach</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 10:11:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Don&amp;#8217;t Care About The Book</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/05/30/dont-care-about-the-book/#comment-1375156</link><description>Shouldn't that be Sofia Coppola's &lt;i&gt;Virgin Suicides&lt;/i&gt;?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pasquinn</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 22:20:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Don&amp;#8217;t Care About The Book</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/05/30/dont-care-about-the-book/#comment-1375155</link><description>Which, neatly enough, is one of the themes of Old Joy, as well.  How we all end up "departing from the original" over time -- with or without admitting it.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's been done in writing often enough - first and maybe still best in Wordsworth -- but it's interesting to see it done well in the time and space of a movie.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rory Mach</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 11:46:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Don&amp;#8217;t Care About The Book</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/05/30/dont-care-about-the-book/#comment-1375154</link><description>Old Joy is one of my favorite recent movies.  I haven't read the short story, but the film itself is a gem, and Oldham and London carry the film well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As someone who was trained in an English department but eventually did research on film and media studies, I'm fascinated by the issue of adaptation, and quite often I find that the best adaptations are the ones that acknowledge how they depart from the original text (and, of course, Adaptation is a clever negotiation of the problematics of adaptation).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chuck</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 00:21:09 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>