<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>newcritics - Latest Comments in Deborah Kerr</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/</link><description>the best in web criticism</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 02:06:28 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Deborah Kerr</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/10/19/deborah-kerr/#comment-18346995</link><description>she made a lot of contribution in terms of motion pictures, shes an icon on her era.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">printer1</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 02:06:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Deborah Kerr</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/10/19/deborah-kerr/#comment-16538438</link><description>Deborah will be sorely missed. Almost the same impact on me like Heath Ledger.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stroketreatment</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:47:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Deborah Kerr</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/10/19/deborah-kerr/#comment-14466753</link><description>Very very interesting post..I like this one. gotta bookmark this one.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://gadgettechblog.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;gadgettechblog.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gadget_Blog</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 02:11:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Deborah Kerr</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/10/19/deborah-kerr/#comment-1379893</link><description>Well that's a bit short for such a long and brilliant careers. Her early Hollywood films were not her best. It's by the 1950s and 1960s that her talent as actress (more than movie star) became obvious though movies like The Innocents or Night of the Iguana.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Come on, can't you do her greater justice?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Frenchdoc</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 00:38:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Deborah Kerr</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/10/19/deborah-kerr/#comment-1379892</link><description>I'd never thought about it before, but Grace Kelly was a sort of Americanized Deborah Kerr: the aristocratic blonde angel with an obvious emotional strength, including least a hint of raw sexuality, under all that hauteur. Like Sharon Stone, only under control. Okay, that's not fair, I actually like Sharon Stone, but restraint carried its own power, and it seems to be lost.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">estiv</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 12:51:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Deborah Kerr</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/10/19/deborah-kerr/#comment-1379891</link><description>While unfamiliar with her, I have the impression her movie career inspired a generation of mothers to name their daughters "Deborah;" much more than, say, "Ingrid," "Greer," or even "Marlene/Marlena."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kathleen Maher</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 15:33:42 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>