<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>newcritics - Latest Comments in Damaged Goods or Why I Wasn&amp;#8217;t Scandalized by Notes on a Scandal</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/</link><description>the best in web criticism</description><atom:link href="https://newcritics.disqus.com/damaged_goods_or_why_i_wasn8217t_scandalized_by_notes_on_a_scandal/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 21:27:01 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Damaged Goods or Why I Wasn&amp;#8217;t Scandalized by Notes on a Scandal</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/06/05/damaged-goods-or-why-i-wasnt-scandalized-by-notes-on-a-scandal/#comment-14409734</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Virtual casting machines is totally awesome, as we all kn ow more and more machines now a days are being invented and developed and it is good to hear that some of these machine are for medical use&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">health insurance coverage</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 21:27:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Damaged Goods or Why I Wasn&amp;#8217;t Scandalized by Notes on a Scandal</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/06/05/damaged-goods-or-why-i-wasnt-scandalized-by-notes-on-a-scandal/#comment-10249004</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I was just browsing through your blog and so this one deep down in your achieves, I must say it's a well written post, I liked reading it a lot, thanks for posting it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Debra&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Medela metro bag</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 02:28:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Damaged Goods or Why I Wasn&amp;#8217;t Scandalized by Notes on a Scandal</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/06/05/damaged-goods-or-why-i-wasnt-scandalized-by-notes-on-a-scandal/#comment-1375218</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If we had this virtual casting machine, shouldn't we consider Hepburn? (Katherine, not Audrey).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Surely such a wonder would have power over such trivia as death?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom Watson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 13:04:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Damaged Goods or Why I Wasn&amp;#8217;t Scandalized by Notes on a Scandal</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/06/05/damaged-goods-or-why-i-wasnt-scandalized-by-notes-on-a-scandal/#comment-1375217</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I mostly agree, although I thought Dench's ferocious performance made the question of her sex appeal unimportant. The miracle of the movie was that even though we saw she was deluded, we still kept faith with her, because we didn't want her to be so lonely.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And I do think there are women like Sheba who don't guard themselves with other women, the way they would with men.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But you're absolutely right about Blanchett being just too strong and too smart to play the role as a butterfly (or, I would say) as a naif.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cut her loose, I say. I want to see her as a maneater, not a woman-tempter...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kit Stolz</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 01:52:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Damaged Goods or Why I Wasn&amp;#8217;t Scandalized by Notes on a Scandal</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/06/05/damaged-goods-or-why-i-wasnt-scandalized-by-notes-on-a-scandal/#comment-1375216</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No amount of "analysis" can do justice to their catfighting or Patrick Marber's silly screenplay. Overwrought is a good description for Notes, failed camp is another.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sean</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 08:41:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Damaged Goods or Why I Wasn&amp;#8217;t Scandalized by Notes on a Scandal</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/06/05/damaged-goods-or-why-i-wasnt-scandalized-by-notes-on-a-scandal/#comment-1375215</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Love the idea of a virtual recasting machine. Hey, how about a post - top 10 parts you'd recast?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Haven't seen this one, Lance, but it's another in your long-running campaign for believability in movie roles and situations.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom Watson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 22:11:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Damaged Goods or Why I Wasn&amp;#8217;t Scandalized by Notes on a Scandal</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/06/05/damaged-goods-or-why-i-wasnt-scandalized-by-notes-on-a-scandal/#comment-1375214</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Lance, interesting take on the movie.  I enjoyed it when I saw it, but (as usual) you make some good points.  I thought that Dench was deliciously malevolent, but I think you're right that she's too old.  I also think I was distracted by wardrobe (and real estate) envy to think clearly about Blanchett.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Claire</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:41:39 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>