<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>newcritics - Latest Comments in Back to the Fifties: Curtains &amp;amp; Indiana Jones and that Crystal Skull</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/</link><description>the best in web criticism</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 22:37:08 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Back to the Fifties: Curtains &amp;amp; Indiana Jones and that Crystal Skull</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/05/26/back-to-the-fifties-curtains-indiana-jones-and-that-crystal-skull/#comment-1384684</link><description>But even the amusing parts were so derivative (ie: the Back to the Future bits you mentioned).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;MA: I hope the X-Files movie will be good, but I just don't know.  It's been a long time since the show ended, and the new Indy is an example of how it's hard to recapture that essence or energy from the original.  I remember seeing the first movie (and something about an army of bees?) but that's about it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Claire Helene</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 22:37:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Back to the Fifties: Curtains &amp;amp; Indiana Jones and that Crystal Skull</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/05/26/back-to-the-fifties-curtains-indiana-jones-and-that-crystal-skull/#comment-1384683</link><description>My 10-year-old told me "I liked the prairie dogs, but they were just CGI."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Audiences are overly sophisticated these days, I guess. I enjoyed the flick, and thought Ford really came on - but the whole thing died when they hit South America to me. Too much...well, just too damned much. Three waterfalls! Up till then it had a bit of that Back to the Future cultural stuff that I found amusing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom Watson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 21:27:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Back to the Fifties: Curtains &amp;amp; Indiana Jones and that Crystal Skull</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/05/26/back-to-the-fifties-curtains-indiana-jones-and-that-crystal-skull/#comment-1384682</link><description>Claire, we can only HOPE the X-Files is going to be good. James, that's an interesting plot line. And they could have CGI'd a cameo by Olivier to add some class.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">M.A. Peel</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 08:08:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Back to the Fifties: Curtains &amp;amp; Indiana Jones and that Crystal Skull</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/05/26/back-to-the-fifties-curtains-indiana-jones-and-that-crystal-skull/#comment-1384681</link><description>Duh. I misspelled villains. Sorry. Damn those phonics.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JamesS</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 00:10:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Back to the Fifties: Curtains &amp;amp; Indiana Jones and that Crystal Skull</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/05/26/back-to-the-fifties-curtains-indiana-jones-and-that-crystal-skull/#comment-1384680</link><description>Oops! Kate is spelled Cate. My bad.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JamesS</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 00:01:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Back to the Fifties: Curtains &amp;amp; Indiana Jones and that Crystal Skull</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/05/26/back-to-the-fifties-curtains-indiana-jones-and-that-crystal-skull/#comment-1384679</link><description>I thought they should have stuck with the Nazi villians. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If they kept the timeline and South American location, they could have used Hitchcock's Notorious as a crib sheet and have a band of 50's Neo-Nazi die hards steal the ark back and try to use it to revive Der Furher. (The Boys From Brazil meet That Man From Rio).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Kate B. could do an homage to Marlene Dietrich--I know she can do it, she has the cheekbones. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Zowey! Let's greenlight it!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JamesS</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 23:44:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Back to the Fifties: Curtains &amp;amp; Indiana Jones and that Crystal Skull</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2008/05/26/back-to-the-fifties-curtains-indiana-jones-and-that-crystal-skull/#comment-1384678</link><description>I saw the new Indy yesterday, and I was pleased that I saw it in a venue where there was delicious beer and pizza available for me to partake in while I watched.  The beer helped.  I thought the movie was fairly lazy.  It's nice they brought Marian back, but they didn't give her anything to do, and barely any lines.  The whole thing felt like a retread of Indy knock-offs.  And I hated what the crystal skull was, that seemed so very lazy to me.  You can't come up with a better ancient thing?  If I wanted X-Files, I'd have watched X-Files.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree completely with the tiredness of Ford in the warehouse, and with your comment about the prairie dogs, we thought that too.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Claire Helene</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 11:57:01 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>