<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>newcritics - Latest Comments in A Reason to Go On Living: That Chord</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/</link><description>the best in web criticism</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 19:37:03 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: A Reason to Go On Living: That Chord</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/03/24/a-reason-to-go-on-living-that-chord/#comment-1374607</link><description>When George Harrison appeared in the film "A Hard DayÃ‚Â´s Night" with a Rickenbacker 360/12, the musician started to buy 12 strings guitars, that was a fact, not Mc Guinn, not Gerry and the Peacemakers, not  Brian Jones or Richard (Vox 12 strings guitars). The album A Hard DayÃ‚Â´s Night have 12`s strings all over it, for example: A Hard DayÃ‚Â´s Night, I Should Have Known Better, If I fell, Any Time at All, When I Get Home, You CanÃ‚Â´t Do That, Tell me Why, if this album is not a 12 strings one and it was not an influence  for that kind of instruments,IÃ‚Â´m getting crazy !!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dupoint</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 19:37:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Reason to Go On Living: That Chord</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/03/24/a-reason-to-go-on-living-that-chord/#comment-1374605</link><description>interesting</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">George</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 03:59:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Reason to Go On Living: That Chord</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/03/24/a-reason-to-go-on-living-that-chord/#comment-1374603</link><description>Type your comment here. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wait. THE CHORD for a Rickenbacker 12 string...and it isn't the sequence of "Turn, Turn, Turn" or anything of the Byrds? Not possible. Iconic? Please, Harrison isn't associated with a 12 string in general, nor could anyone hear that chord and think 12 string, rather than just sonic. &lt;br&gt;The reference you put up isn't plausible and has been contested, the reference to the Byrds is THE 60s introduction of that instrument as a distinct sonic and visual icon, that got so many teenagers off to buy one and believe for at least a few months they would master it. Otherwise, sure, the rest is clear, there is nothing stopping me from salivating all over the Beatles legacy of chords and songs, but... the wiki page is a bit off-putting.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Frank Weaver</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 16:38:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Reason to Go On Living: That Chord</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/03/24/a-reason-to-go-on-living-that-chord/#comment-1374601</link><description>Great post. Chords are magical things. Being a rhythm guitarist, I've always had a soft spot for hollowbodies in general. Owned one in High School for a short while. I don't think any other type of electric guitar sounds as warm to me. Can you imagine Chet Atkins playing a strat?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ralph</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 22:02:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Reason to Go On Living: That Chord</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/03/24/a-reason-to-go-on-living-that-chord/#comment-1374600</link><description>I don't know about the solo, but That Chord is a Rick 12 string.  Owning a Rick won't make you sound like John Lennon or Roger McGuinn, but you won't sound like them, or be able to play That Chord without one.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ask Tom Petty......</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jackson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 16:52:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Reason to Go On Living: That Chord</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/03/24/a-reason-to-go-on-living-that-chord/#comment-1374598</link><description>Fantastic piece!!!  You'll find MANY axe collectors here at Newcritics.  I think a couple of us have bragged, oops... I mean, posted our respective quivers at our home bases.  The one you feature in this post is quite a gem.  I'm drooling at the photos as we speak.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While I would argue that Keith's opening riff in "Satisfaction" with Bill's bass lumbering underneath moved bigger mountains, hey, I can certainly relate to the zeal in which you dig into the intricacies and nuance of Fab Four music.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now, if I can find a way to pick up a 360-12 without my wife knowingÃ¢â‚¬Â¦</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tony Alva</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 16:20:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Reason to Go On Living: That Chord</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/03/24/a-reason-to-go-on-living-that-chord/#comment-1374597</link><description>Everything in music can be classified as BC (before THE chord) or AC. It was a clarion wake-up call to an entire generation of musicians.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Neddie, man, where do you live? Can I come over and look at (maybe touch...play, even?) the axe before it goes back to your lunatic (how could let it out his possession?) friend?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephen Manzi</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:07:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Reason to Go On Living: That Chord</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/03/24/a-reason-to-go-on-living-that-chord/#comment-1374596</link><description>Viscount: Listen very carefully to the sixth note of the solo. I hear an upward slide of a whole note -- from a C to a D on the A string. Can't do that with a piano.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Neddie Jingo</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 12:30:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Reason to Go On Living: That Chord</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/03/24/a-reason-to-go-on-living-that-chord/#comment-1374595</link><description>Ned - I always thought that Martin "doubled" the solo on the acoustic piano (one of the lower registers.)  I never saw that documented anywhere but it sounds like that to my ears.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Viscount LaCarte</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 11:13:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Reason to Go On Living: That Chord</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/03/24/a-reason-to-go-on-living-that-chord/#comment-1374594</link><description>Wow. This is ultra-weird. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm going to say something rather heretical here, so don't jump down my throat...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't believe George Harrison played the solo on "A Hard Day's Night" on a Rickenbacker 360-12.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My first piece of evidence, entirely circumstantial, I admit, is this. The version recorded live at the BBC, which you can find on "The Beatles at the BBC," has one of the funniest edits I've ever heard: when the Fabs get to the solo, the BBC simply edits in the solo from the record. No attempt to hide it or anything -- I guess they thought it wouldn't be remarked by the unsophisticated audience listening over the radio. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So why wouldn't they use the solo as George played it? Maybe because he clammed it so badly --&lt;i&gt;repeatedly,&lt;/i&gt; because it wasn't a true live broadcast and George could have taken as many mulligans as he needed -- that it was unusable. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I will say this: That solo is a &lt;i&gt;beeyotch&lt;/i&gt; to play -- and I'm a pretty fair guitar player. The first phrase is very easy, but those triplets in the second phrase are &lt;i&gt;very&lt;/i&gt; hard to play crisply.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ian MacDonald says that it was recorded at half-speed an octave lower -- but this is clearly impossible because the guitar solo is being played on its lowest strings; you &lt;i&gt;can't&lt;/i&gt; play an octave lower.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wikipedia theorizes that it wasn't a guitar at all, but George Martin playing a harpsichord. I don't buy this one either, because there's a very clear slide up two frets on the sixth note of the solo -- impossible with any keyboard. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But Wikipedia does get one thing right, and this is the most damning detail: &lt;i&gt;the notes in the solo are two octaves apart,&lt;/i&gt; not one, as the 12-string guitar is tuned.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This hints that the thing was played at half-speed -- by two guitars, or by one guitar and a harpsichord, or by a solo harpsichord. But not a Rick 12-string.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Come on over to &lt;a href="http://byneddiejingo.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;my place&lt;/a&gt; later this evening -- I'm going to post the solo, and the edit from the BBC session. Let's get to the bottom of this.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Neddie Jingo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 20:20:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Reason to Go On Living: That Chord</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/03/24/a-reason-to-go-on-living-that-chord/#comment-1374593</link><description>&lt;em&gt;That chord&lt;/em&gt; might be responsible for the entire existence of XTC...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Andy talks about it on his "How &lt;em&gt;This is Pop&lt;/em&gt; Came to Be."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As usual Ned.  Great post.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Viscount LaCarte</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 15:17:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Reason to Go On Living: That Chord</title><link>http://newcritics.com/blog1/2007/03/24/a-reason-to-go-on-living-that-chord/#comment-1374591</link><description>Oh yes. And the fact that the chord introduced the song instead of being somewhere in the middle, and that it was not obscured under any vocals, meant that it was highlighted in a way unusual in pop music. It also could not be lost under a D.J.'s patter, unlike most intros.&lt;br&gt;It could be argued that the single most important element of the Beatles' success was their often-stated desire to do something different every time, and not to copy (while never denying their influences) anyone, including themselves. So that chord, as well as the reverb-less double string quartet on "Yesterday" (before then, strings in pop music were almost always violins drenched in reverb), and the sitar on "Norwegian Wood," all from 1964-65--before they became celebrated for their musical adventurousness--all exemplify their attempts to escape boundaries, to send back dispatches from the unkown.  &lt;br&gt;Hearing that chord on the radio was a kind of shock every time. Considering that George was known for his love of unusual chords (such as the E7 flat 9 in "I Want to Tell You"), I wonder if he was responsible for this one.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">estiv</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 12:38:46 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>